Antibiotics Removal in Biological Sewage Treatment Plants

نویسندگان

  • Gopal Ghosh 1. Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan; 2. Departments of Environmental Science and Technology, Jessore University of Science and Technology, Jessore 7408, Bangladesh
  • H. Tanaka Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • N. Yamashita Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • S. Hanamoto Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • X. Huang Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
چکیده مقاله:

This study investigated the occurrence and removal of 12 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) at four sewage treatment plants (STPs): two STPs in Kyoto, Japan and two STPs in Beijing, China. The STPs differed in design and operation conditions, utilized a variety of secondary treatment processes. The antibiotics were frequently detected in influents and effluents, and ranged from ng/L up to lower μg/L. In influent, clarithromycin (1.1–1.6 μg/L) and levofloxacin (3.6–6.8 μg/L) were detected in the highest concentration in Japanese and Chinese STPs, respectively. The overall elimination of the antibiotics were differed between STPs and ranged from negative to >90%. These data demonstrate that there are detectable levels of antibiotics are discharging from STPs, and only some of these antibiotics are being removed in a significant proportion by STPs. It was also observed that biological nutrient removal based sewage treatment processes (anaerobic–anoxic–oxic: A2O; and anoxic–oxic: AO) have relatively higher antibiotics removal efficiencies than oxidation ditch (OD) processes.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

antibiotics removal in biological sewage treatment plants

this study investigated the occurrence and removal of 12 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) at four sewage treatment plants (stps): two stps in kyoto, japan and two stps in beijing, china. the stps differed in design and operation conditions, uti...

متن کامل

Removal of antibiotics from wastewater by sewage treatment facilities in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China.

Concentrations of nine antibiotics [erythromycin-H(2)O (ERY-H(2)O); trimethoprim (TMP); tetracycline (TET); norfloxacin (NOR); penicillin G (PEN G); penicillin V (PEN V); cefalexin (CLX); cefotaxim (CTX); and cefazolin (CFZ)] were measured in influent and effluent samples from four sewage treatment plants (STPs) in Hong Kong as well as in influent samples from one STP in Shenzhen. Levels of PEN...

متن کامل

Occurrence of antibiotics in eight sewage treatment plants in Beijing, China.

The occurrence, removal efficiency and seasonal variation of 22 antibiotics, including eight fluoroquinolones, nine sulfonamides and five macrolides, were investigated in eight sewage treatment plants (STPs) in Beijing, China. A total of 14 antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples, with the maximum concentration being 3.1 μg L(-1) in the influent samples and 1.2 μg L(-1) in the effluent ...

متن کامل

Life Cycle Assessment of Biological Nutrient Removal Wastewater Treatment Plants

Advances in wastewater treatment over the past 150 years have improved public health and local water quality. Recently however, society has begun to consider the wider environmental implications of these improvements. This paper uses life cycle assessment to quantitatively compare the environmental costs and benefits of different wastewater treatment technologies and standards. It is demonstrat...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده

{@ msg_add @}


عنوان ژورنال

دوره 2  شماره 2

صفحات  131- 139

تاریخ انتشار 2016-04-01

با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023